Hi,

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 6:44 AM, Andrey Andreev <n...@devilix.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> 
>> wrote:
>>> On 03.09.2018 at 17:02, Andrey Andreev wrote:
>>>
>>>> I raised this issue back in January[1], but then got distracted and
>>>> completely forgot about it ... sorry about that.
>>>
>>> Thanks for having raised the issue. :)
>>
> Yeah, I recall that discussion and I don't recall any strong
> objections. +1 to lifting the bar.  If you're using latest PHP, then
> you can be expected to have reasonably-recent ICU.
>
>>>> Would the change target 7.3 or 7.4?
>>>
>>> IMO, we should target master (i.e. 7.4) only.
>>>
>>
> Concur.  Feature freeze means feature freeze.  Nothing stops anyone
> from using a more recent ICU with 7.3. There's no urgency
> justification for overriding FF here.
>
>> I know we're past feature freeze, but can we maybe do 4.6 in 7.3 and
>> then 50 in 7.4? We already know ICU 4.6 works well and older versions
>> aren't widespread; it's not like it needs extensive evaluation.
>>
> No. See above.  There is no urgency justification for it.
>

Right ... I wasn't saying it's urgent, just wasn't sure whether FF
rule applies. If it does, I'm not trying to bend it.

Cheers,
Andrey.

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to