On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > 2/3+1 is silly, though. 2/3 already means there's twice as many agreeing as > disagreeing, having +1 doesn't serve the tie-breaking function there that it > does for 50%+1. But that was indeed a knife-edge RFC, it was actually saved > by someone chosing to vote Yes at the last minute. > I can buy that argument, but since there IS room to disagree, then such should be spelled out clearly in the voting update RFC. Let's decide and not leave it to subjective interpretation.
-Sara -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
