Hey Sara, Sara Golemon wrote:
I don't remember the specifics about integer semantics (which fell precisely on 2/3 and thus would have failed the +1 check), but again I'll offer than perhaps both needed more discussion, and maybe shouldn't have passed. *shrug* -Sara
2/3+1 is silly, though. 2/3 already means there's twice as many agreeing as disagreeing, having +1 doesn't serve the tie-breaking function there that it does for 50%+1. But that was indeed a knife-edge RFC, it was actually saved by someone chosing to vote Yes at the last minute.
-- Andrea Faulds https://ajf.me/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
