Am 10.09.2017 um 21:25 schrieb Ryan Pallas:
On Sep 10, 2017 1:23 PM, "li...@rhsoft.net <mailto:li...@rhsoft.net>"
<li...@rhsoft.net <mailto:li...@rhsoft.net>> wrote:
Am 10.09.2017 um 21:16 schrieb Theodore Brown:
On Sunday, September 10, 2017 12:45 PM Rowan Collins
<rowan.coll...@gmail.com <mailto:rowan.coll...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Would it be possible to add an optional `$strict`
parameter to
switch? E.g.
```
switch ($i, true) {
I'd very much prefer a "strict switch ($i) { ... }" over
a second parameter.
What do either of you think of my "switch-use" proposal,
which would spell this as "switch ($i) use (===)"?
That seems more complicated and confusing than either of the
other options. Normally `use()` is for inheriting variables in
anonymous functions.
where did you see `use()` in the proposed SYNTAX?
hint: it's not there
it's just "strict switch" versus "switch"
Rowan's suggestion included use
the whole switch discussion is broken by design
with "<?php declare(strict_types=1);" the intention is pretty clear
raise an error if cases are mixed (case 'a' and case 1 und the same
switch) and also raise an error in a case libe below when $a is anything
else then int
there is reall yno syntax sugar needed - the first statement of the file
contains the intention of the developer and yes i migrated a 250000 LOC
codebase stared in 2003 with PHP4 to PHP7 with strict types for every
single file
switch($a)
{
case 1: ..; break;
case 2: ..; break;
}
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
