On Sunday, September 10, 2017 12:45 PM Rowan Collins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> Would it be possible to add an optional `$strict` parameter to
>>> switch? E.g.
>>> ```
>>> switch ($i, true) {
>>
>> I'd very much prefer a "strict switch ($i) { ... }" over a second parameter.
>
> What do either of you think of my "switch-use" proposal, which would spell
> this as "switch ($i) use (===)"?
That seems more complicated and confusing than either of the other options.
Normally `use()` is for inheriting variables in anonymous functions.
