On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Remi Collet <r...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Le 09/01/2017 à 10:59, Jakub Zelenka a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Remi Collet <r...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Le 08/01/2017 à 07:46, Joe Watkins a écrit : > >> > >>> I'd like to hear what others think about cleaning up bugsnet, what > >> criteria > >>> we might use for a mass cleanup. > >> > >> Big +1 for a mass cleanup. > >> > >> IMHO all bugs reported against PHP < 5.6 could be cleaned. > > > > > > I disagree with this as many of bugs raised before 5.6 are still valid > bugs > > . The reason is that the code for many extensions hasn't changed for long > > time. Of course there was a port to 7.0 which fixed few and also > introduce > > others but most of the old bugs are still valid. It would just hide > > existing issues IMHO. > > Notice that my proposal includes a "feedback" step ;) > > Sure I noticed that. What I wanted to say is not just to automatically close them if it's possible to try it (e.g. there is a piece of reproducible code) and there is no feedback. Of course if it's not clear how to recreate it and there is no feedback, then I agree it should be set to "Won't fix".
