Dmitry,

I've tried to implement this myself, and it seems to work fine, but I end
up with some weird (unrelated?) test failures after:

https://github.com/php/php-src/compare/master...dshafik:too-few-args-exception

Example test failure:

========DIFF========
001+ Warning: file_get_contents(http://localhost:8964): failed to open
stream: Connection refused in /Users/dshafik/src/
php.net/php-src/tests/basic/bug67198.php on line 29
002+ bool(false)
001- string(4) "PASS"
002- string(4) "PASS"
003+
004+ Warning: file_get_contents(http://localhost:8964): failed to open
stream: Connection refused in /Users/dshafik/src/
php.net/php-src/tests/basic/bug67198.php on line 30
005+ bool(false)
========DONE========
FAIL php://input is empty when enable_post_data_reading=Off
[tests/basic/bug67198.phpt]

and:

========DIFF========
001+ Warning: Declaration of melt\core\DateTime::createFromFormat($format,
$time, ?melt\core\DateTimeZone $timezone = NULL) should be compatible with
DateTime::createFromFormat($format, $time, $object = NULL) in
/Users/dshafik/src/php.net/php-src/ext/date/tests/bug55407.php on line 7
========DONE========

List of failed tests:

=====================================================================
FAILED TEST SUMMARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Test posix_getgrgid() function : basic functionality
[ext/posix/tests/posix_getgrgid_basic.phpt]
Test chdir() function : basic functionality
[ext/standard/tests/dir/chdir_basic-win32-mb.phpt]
Test chdir() function : usage variations - relative paths
[ext/standard/tests/dir/chdir_variation2-win32-mb.phpt]
Test getcwd() function : basic functionality
[ext/standard/tests/dir/getcwd_basic-win32-mb.phpt]
Test readdir() function : usage variations - sub-directories
[ext/standard/tests/dir/readdir_variation3-win32-mb.phpt]
Test readdir() function : usage variations - different file names
[ext/standard/tests/dir/readdir_variation4-win32-mb.phpt]
Test readdir() function : usage variations - operate on previously opened
directory [ext/standard/tests/dir/readdir_variation6-win32-mb.phpt]
Test rewinddir() function : basic functionality
[ext/standard/tests/dir/rewinddir_basic-win32-mb.phpt]
Test scandir() function : basic functionality
[ext/standard/tests/dir/scandir_basic-win32-mb.phpt]
Test scandir() function : usage variations - different sorting constants
[ext/standard/tests/dir/scandir_variation10-win32-mb.phpt]
Test scandir() function : usage variations - different relative paths
[ext/standard/tests/dir/scandir_variation4-win32-mb.phpt]
Test scandir() function : usage variations - different file names
[ext/standard/tests/dir/scandir_variation8-win32-mb.phpt]
Test scandir() function : usage variations - different ints as
$sorting_order arg [ext/standard/tests/dir/scandir_variation9-win32-mb.phpt]
file_get_contents() test using offset parameter out of range
[ext/standard/tests/file/file_get_contents_error001.phpt]
Test lstat() and stat() functions: usage variations - file opened using w
and r mode [ext/standard/tests/file/lstat_stat_variation13.phpt]
Check cli_process_title support on Unix
[sapi/cli/tests/cli_process_title_unix.phpt]
=====================================================================

I can't see how my change has affected this at all; but maybe I missed
something?

Could you review and see if you spot anything?

Thanks,

On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Joe Watkins <pthre...@pthreads.org> wrote:

> Morning all,
>
>    Good idea, +1 for just doing it ...
>
> Cheers
> Joe
>
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't see a big problem accepting this. The change is really minor, and
>> makes sense.
>>
>> Dmitry.
>>
>> On Aug 6, 2016 5:26 AM, Davey Shafik <da...@php.net> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I know this is a little late in the process, but it's something I've
>> noticed while prepping some content around 7.1.
>>
>> This RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/too_few_args
>>
>> Passed, and has been implemented, but I feel that throwing an `\Error`
>> exception is a mistake. I think we should another more concrete exception
>> class for this error:
>>
>> `\TooFewArgumentsError extends \Error`
>>
>> A use case where this may trivially occur is where you are using argument
>> unpacking and the unpacked array is too small. Writing this, just looks bad:
>>
>> try {
>>    foo(… $args);
>> } catch (\Error $e) { }
>>
>> compared:
>>
>> try {
>>    foo(… $args);
>> } catch (\TooFewArgumentsError $e) { }
>>
>> Thoughts? Dmitry?
>>
>> Given the tiny change this is, and that is backwards compatible with the
>> original RFC, I would like to add this to 7.1 for beta3.
>>
>> I think I can make this change myself.
>>
>> - Davey
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to