On 28 June 2016 at 03:36, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > > I like the idea. > > It should be 2/3 tho'.
Why? It's not a language change, so doesn't seem to meet the criteria for needing a 2/3 pass rate. For the record, I'm beginning to think the RFC process should probably be slightly more orchestrated, and RFCs should have a "pre-vote" announcement at least one week before the vote actually opens, when the RFC author thinks the discussion of the RFC is complete. This point would be the time for the implementations full impact on the PHP engine to be analyzed, and also when the final voting choice can be discussed/challenged before the voting is actually open. cheers Dan -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
