On Jan 9, 2016 2:39 PM, "Stanislav Malyshev" <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > > What I said is that these are two different points and should be > > discussed separately. Yes, it will be part of the RFc but talking many > > points at the same time is impossible. > > No, I don't think it's two different points, at least as far as punitive > functions go. If we omit the punitive aspect, then I'm completely fine > with the rest (CoC, mediation team) being discussed first, as I said. > But if you want discussing punishment powers, then we need to be clear > on this, IMHO.
I am not saying we should ignore or omit anything. We simply cannot discuss everything in one shot. It is impossible. We have to divide into smaller topics with assumptions for the unknown. Then we can go back to improve previously discussed topics. > > Early points like the toc of the CoC can be discussed with assumptions. > > Assumptions like 'let say we trust the group to begin with". Then we can > > discuss how the group is chosen. For example. > > How the group is chosen - of course, but that's different issue from > what we were talking about. Yes, like content and actions are also different topics to be discussed separately. > > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalys...@gmail.com
