> On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:29 PM, Paul M. Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If there's an accusation, then *due process* needs to be applied. If it rises > to the level of needing *due process* then the police should be involved. > There's no need, *none at all*, for a star chamber *or* a mob to be an > amenable authority to salve someone's hurt feelings and ban someone else, not > even in a temporary capacity.
Isn’t this RFC setting up the due process? If you harass someone at work, there are review processes and you get fired. In fact, in most states, you don’t need a reason to get fired. You just get fired. They don’t call the police unless they need to press charges for a criminal offense. Why shouldn’t a public open source project set up rules and processes for “firing” someone from the project if they harass someone? -Ben
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
