Hi Pierre,
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Andrea,
On Jan 5, 2016 12:16 AM, "Andrea Faulds" <a...@ajf.me> wrote:
Hmm, this would mean a new dependency, and more potential complexity. I'm
not sure if HTTP/2 justifies it.
Also, don't all the major client implementations of HTTP/2 require TLS?
Or is localhost given a free pass?
To me it would be a huge and hard work to reinvent the wheel by manually
implement http2 support.
This library is widely used and well maintained. It provides all we need
(easy api for frames, push and co, hpack etc.). It is an acceptable trade
off to add one dep to have a compliant http2 support.
Ah, don't get me wrong, I didn't think we should reimplement HTTP/2
ourselves! I just worried about the complexity.
But yeah, since it's a library, I probably shouldn't worry too much. :)
Thanks.
--
Andrea Faulds
https://ajf.me/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
