Yes, releases have been repackaged, see https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2015-December/000051.html
Regards, Niklas 2015-12-03 21:47 GMT+01:00 Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com>: > On 12/03/2015 09:39 AM, Niklas Keller wrote: > > Jan Ehrhardt <php...@ehrhardt.nl> schrieb am Do., 3. Dez. 2015 17:04: > > > > Ferenc Kovacs in php.internals (Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:27:36 +0100): > >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Sebastian Bergmann <sebast...@php.net> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Am 03.12.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Julien Pauli: > >>>> We, PHP, are not distros maintainers. > >>> > >>> Well said. But why, then, do we provide Windows binaries? > >> > >> loaded question, I think it would worth splitting the discussion into a > >> separate thread. > >> my understanding is that at the time when we started distributing > windows > >> binaries there were no binary distributions for php windows. > > > > It might be less needed than before. I am compiling OpenSSL 1.0.2e for > > Windows at the moment. Guess that Anatol is doing the same. > > -- > > Jan > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http:// <http://www.php.net/unsub.php>www.php.net > > <http://www.php.net/unsub.php>/ <http://www.php.net/unsub.php>unsub.php > > <http://www.php.net/unsub.php> > > > > > > Seems like a failed release, make test doesn't work for OpenSSL 1.0.2e. > > Heared other people have other issues on 1.0.1 as well. > > > > Does it work for you? > > The release tarball builds fine against openssl-1.0.1k on Debian-jessie > for me. I haven't tested 1.0.2e yet. Waiting on > https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/openssl/ to get 1.0.2e. > > -Rasmus > > >
