On 23 November 2015 at 09:08, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> wrote:
> On 11/23/2015 09:49 AM, Phil Sturgeon wrote: > > The "There will always be bugs" argument is a strawman, nobody is > > saying wait until it's perfect. > > > > People in this thread are consistently conflating "there will always > > be bugs" with "lets just ignore this bug which is 'around critical' > > and crack on because yolo." > > You seem to be confused Phil. Nobody is arguing that this bug shouldn't > be fixed. The question is all about how severe it is and whether it > should trigger another release candidate. > > -Rasmus > > > Am I missing something here? We found a bug, it was fixed, so if we tag .0 right now, that bug wouldn't be in .0? Not sure I see the issue here? ~C
