I feel like this one is different though, because there already was consensus that the current naming isn't the best, and there was support for Throwable, while voting on the "original" RFC was still open.
To adhere to the RFC process, the open RFC wasn't changed accordingly, because voting was already underway. And then we collectively dropped the ball when it came to remembering to do this little Throwable proposal and change. Think of it more as just a few renames to fix engine exceptions before they go out. David P.S. *bump* by the way ;) > On 30.04.2015, at 18:51, Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > >> We could make an exception (sic !) and add the Throwable interface to PHP7, >> even after feature freeze, because it is an easy pick and having a clear >> Exception model for 7.0 is to my opinion very important. > > I'm OK with it but I fear this is opening a can of worms, since people > will start arguing "well, we've added Throwable so let's also add this > other thing which is absolutely 100% necessary" and here goes our > feature freeze. Maybe I'm just too cynical :) Anyway, I don't have any > objection on substance to it. So if everybody is ok with it, I'm fine > with it too. > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalys...@gmail.com > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
