On May 1, 2015 1:24 AM, "Marcio Almada" <marcio.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Stas, > > 2015-04-30 13:51 GMT-03:00 Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi! > > > > > We could make an exception (sic !) and add the Throwable interface to > > PHP7, > > > even after feature freeze, because it is an easy pick and having a clear > > > Exception model for 7.0 is to my opinion very important. > > > > I'm OK with it but I fear this is opening a can of worms, since people > > will start arguing "well, we've added Throwable so let's also add this > > other thing which is absolutely 100% necessary" and here goes our > > feature freeze. Maybe I'm just too cynical :) Anyway, I don't have any > > objection on substance to it. So if everybody is ok with it, I'm fine > > with it too. > > -- > > Stas Malyshev > > smalys...@gmail.com > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > I agree with you, but the process isn't perfect - and will never be. Taking > RFC guidelines without exceptions is damaging to quality in this case. If > someone else decide to open a new RFC after the deadline without the same > level of consensus we have here, the RFC will be put down, hopefully.
Let do a rfc to accept to post pone features freeze with a list or a single RFC. I totally agree that this exact problem has to be fixed for 7.0, same for error cb. I don't see anything else being so critical that it has to be in 7.0. My point for error cb is that it requires quite some changes in extensions and if we like to avoid a 7.0 to 7.1 migration pain, it has to be in 7.0. > Thanks.
