Hi! > So consider that discussion open.
I guess this would have to happen sooner or later - sooner or later somebody, when the vote doesn't go their way, would cry "who are all these people? It can't be right they are all legit, there must be something wrong". I'm not sure though where this discussion is supposed to lead. What outcome should it produce? OK, you have singled out 12 people (some I recognize, some I do not, which means nothing except probably my memory is bad or I haven't met them) and called their votes "irregularity". I know if you did that to me I'd be annoyed, but of course they don't have to think like I do. Still, I don't see where this is going - are we to question or reject every vote from a person that votes rarely? Are we to institute stricter rules for who gets a vote, and if so, which ones? Are we just to throw out votes because RFC author doesn't accept them and without them the RFC passes and is it going to be a normal process for us from now on? Discussion of such sort, especially while singling out people for exclusion, is very dangerous and should be done very carefully. Even when not connected to a controversial topic and is bound to change the resulting outcome. When it does, I'm not sure it's a good place and time to start it at all. -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
