Now you are just pushing the limits and doing things your way. Bob clearly stated he does not want a vote and you want with an "unofficial poll"?
You need to learn to let things go their course and not always push matters your way. I do not see how you can pull this move yet still be offended when people call you out on political moves. I hereby kindly ask you to retract this "unofficial poll" and let things go their way, whatever they might be. On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: > All, > > > > First, I decided not to propose Basic STH under my name, despite the fact I > think that not committing to put it to a vote adds unneeded risk for > delivering STH in PHP 7.0. Whether or not it’s put to a vote will be up to > Bob. > > > > Secondly, I do want to attempt to understand what will happen if & when the > Basic STH RFC goes to a vote at some later point in the future (which > according to Bob, will happen if the Dual Mode RFC fails). If I see that > Basic STH is going to fail, I’ll change my vote to be in favor of the Dual > Mode STH RFC, call upon everyone to do the same, and retract my Coercive > mode RFC. > > > > This unofficial-non-RFC poll is here: > wiki.php.net/notrfc/scalar_type_hints > > > > Thanks, > > > > Zeev >
