Not that another +1 is needed, but I'm with Andi here. I do personally like this 3rd proposal as an option, if nothing else because it implements the 'simpler base' at the moment, and allows us, once people are used to this being part of the language, to continue to evolve later. And that evolution can be based upon our real world experience of using this 'base level' of typehinting for a while.
Versus the more complicated versions, of which both Zeev's and Anthony's are. In each their own way. Eli On 3/13/15 1:17 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Agree and I would vote +1 on this even if I'd prefer coercive. It is a > very valid option for a 7.0 and it is future proof. -- | Eli White | http://eliw.com/ | Twitter: EliW |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
