OK, sorry, I was a little negligent with local times. I said that because I sent another message some hours ago. And I was honest when saying ‘I think you didn’t have time to reply’ because I knew it was short. No irony here even if I agree it may seem so, especially in the context.
Actually, I was not totally exact when I said that I published this because I had no reply. After reading the messages again, I thought I had to publish them so that anyone interested can make his own opinion, whatever Anthony had to reply. Regards François De : Nikita Popov [mailto:nikita....@gmail.com] Envoyé : samedi 21 février 2015 17:15 À : Anthony Ferrara Cc : franc...@php.net; Sara Golemon; Lester Caine; internals@lists.php.net; Zeev Suraski; Arvids Godjuks; Robert Stoll; Rasmus Lerdorf; Yasuo Ohgaki; Andrey Andreev; Andi Gutmans; Pierre Joye Objet : Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Using Other Channels (was Scalar Type Declarations v0.5) On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmax...@gmail.com> wrote: Francois, > I sent you a copy of the messages I sent to Sara, asking for more details > about what you consider as 'deplorable' in them. I also sent another message > to get your opinion about the new ruleset I could propose. It seems you > didn't have time to reply. Just hope you don't refuse communication. If this > was the case, go on with vote now, no need to make it look like you're > waiting for me if, behind the scene, you're not ready to communicate. I didn't have the time to reply, because you sent that mail at 01:04 local time **today**, while I was sleeping. And then you sent this mail 10:16 local time (just as I was logging on to check mail). I actually saw this message before the other one. Anthony, maybe you weren't told, but we obviously expect all PHP contributors to be available 24/7. Not reading your mails at 1am on a Saturday is a clear sign that you're refusing to cooperate :P Nikita
