Hi Francois, On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:11 AM, François Laupretre <franc...@tekwire.net> wrote:
> > De : yohg...@gmail.com [mailto:yohg...@gmail.com] De la part de Yasuo > Ohgaki > > > We don't have to integrate DbC into phpdoc. phpdoc may have integration > of new DbC syntax. > > I think it's helpful even if phpdoc copies post/pre condition as > document. > > > > There are too many possibility for DbC syntax. > > We are better to choose something in common among languages. > > No. The more I detail the concept, the more I read alternative proposals, > the more I consider extending phpdoc is the best solution. As I explain in > the RFC, both concepts are closely related, and that's the only solution > I've seen so far that preserves BC. I could add that it proposes a solution > to issues not even detected nor discussed in alternative proposals, like > the syntax for return value, separate check for arguments returned by ref, > built-in type checks, etc. Before we choose an alternative syntax, I think > we should have good reasons, not 'Hey, that's how it's done in D !'. If > there's a good reason to copy D or Eiffel syntax, let's adopt it, but I > haven't read any good reason so far. And D is not so widely used so there's > no user habit. We can copy the concept without copying the syntax. > > I think we're going too fast here. Before giving up and switching to > another syntax, can you give me a little time to present what I have in > mind. I started writing it yesterday evening and it will be ready tomorrow > morning (UTC). Then, we can make a decision. > I didn't notice you have updated the RFC sorry. Sure, I'll read it and respond. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
