> De : yohg...@gmail.com [mailto:yohg...@gmail.com] De la part de Yasuo Ohgaki
> We don't have to integrate DbC into phpdoc. phpdoc may have integration of > new DbC syntax. > I think it's helpful even if phpdoc copies post/pre condition as document. > > There are too many possibility for DbC syntax. > We are better to choose something in common among languages. No. The more I detail the concept, the more I read alternative proposals, the more I consider extending phpdoc is the best solution. As I explain in the RFC, both concepts are closely related, and that's the only solution I've seen so far that preserves BC. I could add that it proposes a solution to issues not even detected nor discussed in alternative proposals, like the syntax for return value, separate check for arguments returned by ref, built-in type checks, etc. Before we choose an alternative syntax, I think we should have good reasons, not 'Hey, that's how it's done in D !'. If there's a good reason to copy D or Eiffel syntax, let's adopt it, but I haven't read any good reason so far. And D is not so widely used so there's no user habit. We can copy the concept without copying the syntax. I think we're going too fast here. Before giving up and switching to another syntax, can you give me a little time to present what I have in mind. I started writing it yesterday evening and it will be ready tomorrow morning (UTC). Then, we can make a decision. Cheers François -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
