On Dec 26, 2014 7:42 PM, "Xinchen Hui" <larue...@php.net> wrote: > > Hey: > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > > >> On 26 Dec 2014, at 05:57, Levi Morrison <le...@php.net> wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Michael Wallner <m...@php.net> wrote: > >>> There's already ZEND_RESULT_CODE, or did I miss anything? > >> > >> According to lxr.php.net, this symbol ZEND_RESULT_CODE is not > >> referenced in any place except its definition. We can begin using it > >> if we like, or even rename it. Theoretically renaming it may break > >> extensions; none that I could find reference it, though. > > > > Hey Levi, > > > > I think we should just rename it, it's a little too long. zend_status or ZEND_STATUS would be fine with me, preferably the former since we tend to use lowercase type names. Another possibility might be zend_result. > > > zend_status +1 > > If you folks like, I could go ahead and write a patch for master to rename it and use it in a bunch of places. > > great, thanks... please only added it to these functions who already > use success/failure, don't change others :)
We could just do the ones returning integer as status as a 2nd step, or in the same commit. The latter would be cleaner.
