Hey:

On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote:
>
>> On 26 Dec 2014, at 05:57, Levi Morrison <le...@php.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Michael Wallner <m...@php.net> wrote:
>>> There's already ZEND_RESULT_CODE, or did I miss anything?
>>
>> According to lxr.php.net, this symbol ZEND_RESULT_CODE is not
>> referenced in any place except its definition. We can begin using it
>> if we like, or even rename it. Theoretically renaming it may break
>> extensions; none that I could find reference it, though.
>
> Hey Levi,
>
> I think we should just rename it, it's a little too long. zend_status or 
> ZEND_STATUS would be fine with me, preferably the former since we tend to use 
> lowercase type names. Another possibility might be zend_result.
>
zend_status +1
> If you folks like, I could go ahead and write a patch for master to rename it 
> and use it in a bunch of places.

great, thanks... please only added it to these functions who already
use success/failure, don't change others :)

thanks
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Andrea Faulds
> http://ajf.me/
>



-- 
Xinchen Hui
@Laruence
http://www.laruence.com/

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to