> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Robert Stoll [mailto:p...@tutteli.ch]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2014 17:17
> An: 'Josh Watzman'; 'PHP internals'
> Betreff: AW: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Nullsafe calls
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Josh Watzman [mailto:jwatz...@fb.com]
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2014 00:08
> > An: PHP internals
> > Betreff: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Nullsafe calls
> >
> > Hey internals! A useful feature that Hack picked up in the last few
> > months are "nullsafe calls", a way of propagating
> failure
> > forward in a series of chained method calls to the end of the whole
> > computation, getting rid of a lot of the
> boilerplate in the
> > middle. I think the feature would be a good one for PHP as well, so
> > I'm submitting this RFC to add it -- you can see
> the RFC
> > itself for a full discussion of the motivation for the feature, as well as 
> > the feature itself:
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/nullsafe_calls
> >
> > Josh Watzman
> >
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe,
> > visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 
> First of all, I like the RFC, I think as well that it is a useful feature for 
> PHP and I already have it on my wish
list
> ;)
> 
> Yet, either I misunderstand the section about short circuiting or I propose 
> to change the behaviour.
> 
> "If $obj is null, when $obj?->foo(..) executes, the arguments will still be 
> evaluated."
> 
> IMO that is wrong. It should not evaluate the arguments since the nullsafe 
> operator (sometimes called "safe
navigation"
> operator in other languages - which is the better wording IMO, maybe change 
> it? But that is just a detail) is just
syntactic
> sugar for making the call only if $bj is not null. So the following:
> 
> $obj = null;
> $obj?->foo($a, $b);
> 
> should be the same as
> 
> $obj = null;
> If($obj !== null){
>  $obj->foo($a, $b);
> }
> 
> hence PHP will not complain that $a and $b where not defined.
> 
> 
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: 
> http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Appendum: I somehow skipped the section "Prior Art". So I see, that the 
different behaviour was on purpose. I do not
think it is a clever idea to implement a common concept differently. In this 
sense -1
Changing the RFC and implementing it the same way others do +1



--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to