Hi! > On 9 Dec 2014, at 23:31, Josh Watzman <jwatz...@fb.com> wrote: > >> 2) It’d probably be better if you made a language specification patch >> before, not after, the RFC is accepted. Having to specify the syntax and >> semantics formally can make what the operator does clearer and help to spot >> issues. Plus, going forward, the language specification should not be an >> afterthought. > > Definitely not an afterthought. I just want to get through all of the "not > clear if it's going to work" bits -- first, the feasibility of the actual > implementation, then whether the RFC got good reception on internals. I'll > make sure to have a spec diff before the RFC goes up for a vote -- does that > sound good?
Yes, that sounds good, thanks! -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
