> Am 28.10.2014 um 14:50 schrieb Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me>: > >> On 28 Oct 2014, at 13:43, Julien Pauli <jpa...@php.net> wrote: >> >> When PHP 5.6 has been released, few weeks/months ago, I explicitely >> stated Ferenc (RMing 5.6 together with me), that *it is not a normal >> thing to have an external domain for phpdbg* >> >> This has never happened before, FWIR >> >> Every code that is part of PHP, that is merged into php.net repo , >> falls under the PHP licence *and* the PHP process of doing things. >> >> One chance is that today the subject shows to everybody and not only >> RM wondering about this. Cool. >> I'm all +1 to merge phpdbg web site content into official php.net >> documentation. >> >> Guys, from an external POV, phpdbg seems very strange for people. Why >> the hell does it have its own github repo and its own website ? This >> is something that has never been seen for *official* php.net content >> and our users are asking questions / assuming things. > > Yeah, I agree this is weird. There’s nothing wrong with keeping around the > github repo to provide phpdbg for older PHP versions, but the main site > should on php.net and it shouldn’t tell the user to go anywhere but php.net. > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ <http://ajf.me/> Just a tiny update on this subject: we’re working on it.
https://github.com/bwoebi/phpdbg-docs <https://github.com/bwoebi/phpdbg-docs> is in markdown what’ll be at some point in the official docs, I hope. It may take some little time to finish this, but then we’ll probably redirect phpdbg.com <http://phpdbg.com/> page to php.net <http://php.net/>. The phpdbg.com <http://phpdbg.com/> page is currently just horribly outdated and a relict from that time before phpdbg was merged into php-src. Bob Weinand
