> On 28 Oct 2014, at 13:43, Julien Pauli <jpa...@php.net> wrote: > > When PHP 5.6 has been released, few weeks/months ago, I explicitely > stated Ferenc (RMing 5.6 together with me), that *it is not a normal > thing to have an external domain for phpdbg* > > This has never happened before, FWIR > > Every code that is part of PHP, that is merged into php.net repo , > falls under the PHP licence *and* the PHP process of doing things. > > One chance is that today the subject shows to everybody and not only > RM wondering about this. Cool. > I'm all +1 to merge phpdbg web site content into official php.net > documentation. > > Guys, from an external POV, phpdbg seems very strange for people. Why > the hell does it have its own github repo and its own website ? This > is something that has never been seen for *official* php.net content > and our users are asking questions / assuming things.
Yeah, I agree this is weird. There’s nothing wrong with keeping around the github repo to provide phpdbg for older PHP versions, but the main site should on php.net and it shouldn’t tell the user to go anywhere but php.net. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
