On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Robert Stoll <p...@tutteli.ch> wrote:
> > > one of your pr's did not keep the author info, it seems as it was > squashed into a single commit: > > > http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commit;h=ec2fff80e768dfb04aa393c06a2b1a42a9e871ff > > so it isn't a problem with the list, but how your PR was merged. > > ofc. probably there are other similar cases, so the potential number of > people with more than 20 commits could be > > different, but this the info we have easy access to, and I don't think > that it would change the numbers significantly. > > > > -- > > Ferenc Kovács > > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu > > I do not think it makes sense to take the number of commits as metric. > People's commit behaviour is different. Some commit only once after > everything is done and others commit regularly after each achieved small > step towards the goal. > I belong rather to the second group. Why should I be favoured over another > person who has only one commit in his pull request? > > are you favored? I was just pointing out a factual error about a claim in an earlier message and how other factors can influence the number of commits counted attributed to a person. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
