Hi Anatol, what do you mean? heap allocated structure? I think, it's not a good option :(
I didn't have time to think about this yet. Thanks. Dmitry. On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol....@belski.net> wrote: > On Sun, August 31, 2014 22:31, Anatol Belski wrote: > > Hi Pierre, > > > > > > On Sun, August 31, 2014 14:12, Pierre Joye wrote: > > > >> Hi Anatol, > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> > >> For what I see it should have no impact, either mem usage or perf but > >> when such offset is used, in 64bit. > >> > >> However some numbers are better, could you provide some using > >> exclusively this syntax and using common apps pls? Only to be sure. > >> > > while testing drupal and wp, i see a regression of .3% on mem usage and > > .1% on perf. When using the exclusive syntax, i see a perf difference > > almost in ms range, so even not worth to mention. The functional part > shows > > no diff so far. > > > Laruence on the IRC suggested to implement this as a new zval type, so I'm > going to try it out yet as that's a cleaner way do go. > > Regards > > Anatol > >
