On 24 Jul 2014, at 21:47, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: > We saw how much time it took us to decide about a version number, let's > not waste cycles on coming up for a name for something that has been named > for over 15 years.
I’d contend CPHP hasn’t been named for 15 years as it has had no name for the implementation itself. Regardless, I’m going to start using CPHP myself and hope it catches on. Though short of adopting a name for the implementation officially (even if it’s just a “nickname”), this problem will continue to exist, and people will keep having to add contract-style definitions to the start of documents explaining what the term they’ve invented to refer to the original implementation means. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
