On 24 Jul 2014, at 21:32, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: > Ok, maybe I missed the context, and if I did apologies for that. Are you > talking about a standard way of discussing it on internals@ when we talk > about the spec and different implementations of it?
Yeah, sorry if I didn’t make myself clear. There are various unofficial internal names for the original PHP implementation including “Zend PHP”, and I think we should settle on one for internal use. We can have it be the “nickname”, much like CPython is the nickname of the original Python implementation. > In that case, my vote (in the risk of agreeing with someone I almost never > agree with) would be calling it 'php.net PHP', as that's exactly what it > is. php.net is not just the website but all of the php.net > infrastructure, the codebase, bug tracking system, etc. - seems like the > most accurate name for it. “PHP.net PHP” isn’t the nicest of names. I think CPHP, analogous to CPython is maybe the best of the available options. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
