Hi Nikita First of all, thanks for your proposal. I'd like to make some comments, see below.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Lazare Inepologlou [mailto:linep...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 7:55 PM > To: Adam Harvey > Cc: Nikita Popov; PHP internals > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Named parameters > > 2013/9/6 Adam Harvey <ahar...@php.net> > > > > > > Variadics/splat: collecting both named and positional arguments into > > one array seems reasonable to me. I think the main use case there > > would be option parameters, which you'd have to validate anyway, so > > positional parameters would be dealt with at that point — I don't see > > separate arrays as conferring any great advantage in terms of > > validating parameters, and it's no simpler conceptually. > > > > > There is a small drawback. Suppose this code: > > function foo( $bar = 0 , ...$args ){} > foo( bart => 3 ); // misspelled name > > According to the RFC, any unknown argument name will fall into the $args > array, making the above code valid. As this cannot be verified statically, it > is a > possible source of bugs. > > Lazare INEPOLOGLOU > Ingénieur Logiciel I agree with Lazare, it seems wrong to me to mix *args and **kwargs and put everything in one argument. Especially because this will hide bugs for sure, but also because if I want to use *args then I do not want necessarily support **kwargs as well (as mentioned in your cons). Btw did I miss something? I could not read anything about **kwargs in your variadics RFC. Because you do not want to introduce it together with *args? I now assume you do not want to introduce **kwargs and handle everything with *args. That's why you came up with the idea to put everything in *args, right? I'd like to outline an example where **kwargs would be very useful. Sorry, somehow off-topic but that's just because this RFC refers to other RFCs which are not yet accepted. I think it's not a good idea to start mixing several RFC. It almost seems like variadics, argument unpacking and named parameters can only coexist together. But anyway... now I go the same way :P **kwargs is very useful if you want to have a type for *args and some options for **kwargs Let's say I have defined a function which renders an arbitrary number of contact details (one contact per row) and you want to be able to pass in some additional html attributes which shall be applied for each <tr>. --- function renderAsTable(array $htmlAttributes, Contact ...$args){} renderAsTable(['class' => 'someClass', 'validate'=>'true'], $contact1, $contact2); vs. function renderAsTable(Contact ...$args, =>...$htmlAttributes){} // =>... should stand for **kwargs, I do not like this syntax but nothing else came into my mind right now renderAsTable($contact1, $contact2, 'class' => 'someClass', 'validate'=>'true'); --- I know, the first syntax doesn't seem to be too bad yet (apart from ['class' => 'someClass', 'validate'=>'true'] is almost looking like named arguments, maybe => isn't a good choice and we should prefer something else?) but consider when you combine it with argument unpacking --- renderAsTable(array_merge($arr, ['class' => 'someClass', 'validate'=>'true']), ], $contact1, $contact2); vs. renderAsTable($contact1, $contact2, 'class' => 'someClass', 'validate'=>'true', ...$arr); --- I prefer the second version and I guess you agree that variadics shall be introduced to reduce array_merge. Thus it seems logical to me to introduce **kwargs as well and therefore I would not mix them and put everything only in one argument. Otherwise you will have problems to introduce **kwargs later on. You could argue one could write the second version and handle everything in the function. But I am pretty sure that no one wants to have such an overhead either. Something like: function renderAsTable(...$args){ $htmlAttributes = [] $contacts = [] foreach($args as $key => $value){ if($value instanceof Contact){ $contacts[] = $value; } else { $htmlAttributes[] = $value; } } //now do your stuff } You could also argue, that one just need to write the function in a different way: function renderAsTable(array $contacts, ...$htmlAttributes){} Might work as a workaround in this case, but then I lose the ability to have a type checked array ;-) Cheers, Robert -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
