2013/9/3 Levi Morrison <morrison.l...@gmail.com> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Levi Morrison <morrison.l...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> In which case we have very different ideas about what good design > > >> is and would never come to any agreement on that. > > > > > > > > > This is already evident in ALL of your recent "discussions" on this ML. > > Go > > > and look: you are the most active participant in each topic and you are > > > bickering in each one. Could you please stop dominating every > discussion? > > > > I'd to say it is more an attempt to understand the needs of one > > feature or another. This is why this ML exists, to discuss (which may > > move to arguing sometimes, so it goes). But I won't ever ask someone > > to stop participating to discussions, unless it goes off topic or the > > tone is not appropriate (had one recently where my tone was not the > > best, I stopped :). > > > > I didn't ask him to stop participating: I asked him to stop dominating > every discussion. There is a significant difference. >
I must say, that I share this opinion. I follow this list quite a while now and it is not the first time, that the discussion about a quite promising proposal were "dominated" until one after the other leaves the discussion -- annoyed and demotivated. > > > > That being said, there is always a point in a RFC discussion where > > there is nothing left to discuss or argue about, we are so far with > > this one. > > > We've been at this point for a while; no new arguments have been raised > despite several people asking to bring it back in focus. > -- github.com/KingCrunch
