On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Levi Morrison <morrison.l...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> In which case we have very different ideas about what good design > >> is and would never come to any agreement on that. > > > > > > This is already evident in ALL of your recent "discussions" on this ML. > Go > > and look: you are the most active participant in each topic and you are > > bickering in each one. Could you please stop dominating every discussion? > > I'd to say it is more an attempt to understand the needs of one > feature or another. This is why this ML exists, to discuss (which may > move to arguing sometimes, so it goes). But I won't ever ask someone > to stop participating to discussions, unless it goes off topic or the > tone is not appropriate (had one recently where my tone was not the > best, I stopped :). > I didn't ask him to stop participating: I asked him to stop dominating every discussion. There is a significant difference. > That being said, there is always a point in a RFC discussion where > there is nothing left to discuss or argue about, we are so far with > this one. We've been at this point for a while; no new arguments have been raised despite several people asking to bring it back in focus.
