Am 26.02.2013 um 00:08 schrieb "Stas Malyshev" <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>:
> Hi! > >> Don't consider it as a syntax change, only as a bugfix. It must have been a >> bug, that this degree of conformity was not yet reached. :-P > > If it changes syntax, it's by definition a syntax change. It does not > matter if you think it should be changed and if you think it's a bug, it > still should be properly reviewed and approved. > >> It's only stupid to vote about such microscopic changes as long as there are >> no real arguments against it in the discussion preceding the implementation. > > It's not stupid to have RFC for all syntax changes. This allows us to > keep track of it and gives us venue that all involved (including tool > makers, etc.) can follow and be reasonably sure they didn't miss syntax > change because somebody considered it microscopic. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 Ok, you are right. Even if I am not a fan of this bureaucracy, I see that this is useful and nescessary. I'll appreciate this in future. Bob -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
