Hi! > Don't consider it as a syntax change, only as a bugfix. It must have been a > bug, that this degree of conformity was not yet reached. :-P
If it changes syntax, it's by definition a syntax change. It does not matter if you think it should be changed and if you think it's a bug, it still should be properly reviewed and approved. > It's only stupid to vote about such microscopic changes as long as there are > no real arguments against it in the discussion preceding the implementation. It's not stupid to have RFC for all syntax changes. This allows us to keep track of it and gives us venue that all involved (including tool makers, etc.) can follow and be reasonably sure they didn't miss syntax change because somebody considered it microscopic. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
