Hi! > I wasn't assuming. I was outright making a factual statement. I never > made any implications of the intellectual levels of those implementing > the spec. I understand the RFC full well and know why the design is > the way it is. I was answering the ops question. Please read what I > said before you make your own assumptions.
Sorry, statements like "haphazard way", "never well designed", "it's a mess", "they don't really resemble namespaces", "just some fancy magic", etc. have nothing to do with facts. Actually, facts are exactly the opposite - they were designed, were extensively discussed with soliciting feedback from many stakeholders, and were implemented exactly as planned. You may not like the way there were implemented, that's your opinion (not a fact) and you are entitled to it. But you didn't limit yourself to saying "I don't like them". You specifically said that they were never well designed and haphazardly implemented. This is factually false. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
