On 21/08/12 10:36, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Hi

2012/8/21 Tjerk Anne Meesters <datib...@php.net>:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Rasmus Schultz <ras...@mindplay.dk> wrote:

Thank you, but this isn't really anything like what I had in mind.

What I had in mind is more like set-semantics for arrays, e.g. designed to
work with sets of distinct values/objects.

Since I do not have permission to write on the wiki, I posted an initial
draft here:

https://gist.github.com/321ad9b4b8c4e1713488

Just an idea, since array_delete() may remove multiple values, I would
change the return value to (int) and return how many elements were removed
from the array.
Int would be better and callable should be accepted like array_walk().
It's better to have array_delete_recursive(), too.
I updated the page.
Callable? What? This is to remove a single value, like a set. If you want to remove based on a function, array_walk() is always available. And allowing a callable would prevent you from removing closures or strings! D:

array_add() needs more discussion.
What we should do with array value, accept callable or not, etc.
Why accept a callable?
I don't think it needs more discussion, I can't see how it could be made any better than it currently is.
Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net






On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote:

Hi,

2012/8/21 Rasmus Schultz <ras...@mindplay.dk>:
I have a login (mindplay) but I do not have permission to post or edit
anything on the wiki...
I've created RFC for this

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_delete

Get wiki account and finish discussion.
I may write patch for this with my spare time, but
it may take while to find time. I suggest write patch
and send pull request.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Will Fitch <willfi...@php.net> wrote:

Please let this die until someone is serious enough to come up with an
rfc. This has been nothing but counterproductive arguing. If someone
feels
strongly about it, write an rfc then we can discuss?
On Aug 20, 2012 7:53 PM, "Yasuo Ohgaki" <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote:

Hi,

2012/8/21 Herman Radtke <hermanrad...@gmail.com>:
May be we should have something like
array_delete_if($array, function($v, $k=null) { if ($v == 300)
return
true; })
So array_filter?
I'll use it or like for deleting, but the point of this thread is
"intuitive function for deleting element(s)"

array_delete($array, $value|callable)

would be nicer for users, perhaps.

You are basically asking to alias array_filter with "array_delete".
That is
a very slippery slope. I think array_filter is very a very obvious
choice to
remove something from an array. The "filter" function/method is
common
in
functional languages (and functional frameworks like Underscore).

These are things developers just need to learn as part of
development.
Really, this is entire thread should be on stack overflow, not
internals.

I guess you haven't read later post.

You've also made a novice mistake.
array_filter() DO NOT delete elements, but creates new array.
array_delete() is another form of array_walk(), not array_filter().
See my posts.

Having a API for dedicated task is good thing.
Who would argue array_pop()/array_push() isn't needed?

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




--
--
Tjerk


--
Andrew Faulds
http://ajf.me/


--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to