hi Tom, On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Tom Boutell <t...@punkave.com> wrote: > I don't think a consensus on the following points is likely to emerge > without voting on them individually. I propose carrying out a vote > with up to three questions to be answered depending on your response > to each. We could then proceed to discuss the (relatively boring but > essential) details of keywords and extensions, if any, and create a > final RFC. > > Hopefully all parties can agree to be bound by the results of a vote > on these three questions and work together to create a final RFC that > abides by the result or let the matter drop. > > Let's briefly discuss whether these questions truly represent the > major differences between the three RFCs (not the merits of those > positions please) and then, I hope, carry out a vote on them so we can > move on.
Agreed on your proposed next steps. It would rock if you could lead this effort and come up with a RFC covering the various points. I would suggest to sit down together with the other RFCs' authors and get that done. But please, no more discussions here about that. Makes no sense :) Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
