On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 10:25:21 +0100, Stefan Esser wrote:
See you do it again. You claim I believe EMET has been created because of Suhosin. I never said that. Although one of the lead developers of EMET compared it himself to it. You know some features of Suhosin are already in PHP and the HTTP response splitting drama shows that when you break it there is a secondary layer of defense that protects you in case you use Suhosin.
Curious choice of words, because the "drama" was entirely fabricated by you. What could have been an e-mail pointing a fairly trivial (even if somewhat negligent) bug became an absurd verbiage complete with an imagined narrative (!), paternalist tone, assumptions about me and the rest of the developers, futurology and inductive fallacies.
I'm happy that you commented on the issue, not only because of the bug you pointed out but also because of other problems (like CRLF + (SP or HT) being disallowed). But I could do without the dramatization, which just shows (see also the other thread) how pointless it is to engage with you in anything but strictly technical issues, which I'll refrain from doing from now on.
-- Gustavo Lopes -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
