Hi!
with many hundret active sessions was not a
single performance problem
I'm not sure I understand what you are talking about here. Performance
is a scale, not a trigger. If you lose 10% (totally invented number as
an example) that doesn't mean you have 10 of "performance problems", it
means you sites run 10% slower, you need 10% more servers, etc.
without bytecode-cache you have much more problems
What bytecode cache has to do with it? Sounds like a non-sequitur.
thus may not be beneficial to the most users
security is not beneficial to the most users?
Please don't do that. I never said that security is not beneficial, and
as you quoted me you know that and you know that "not beneficial"
related to the performance hit the mitigation measures cost.
security is THE benefit for ALL users, especially in days where many
are running crap-code like Joomla/Wordpress with all sorts of plugins
throwing millions of warning if you run with E_ALL and E_STRCIT
What the quality of the code of Joomla has to do with anything? Suhosin
patches would not fix Joomla and most of the issues it helps with are
totally unrelated to any user code at all.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
