2011/11/10 Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com>:
> hi Stas,
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> This attitude only makes me lose a lot of time answering questions
>>> instead of focusing on actual RFC stability. I want to propose
>>> something stable, I do not want to be pressured about should the RFC
>>> exist or not. It only delays the real voting results. What I can do to
>>> address this?
>>
>> I would concentrate on cleaning up RFC and bringing it to some state that is
>> stable and that has some consensus behind it. Right now I see many people
>> are against it. So I would address the concerns raised (provided it's
>> possible), refine all unclear points and then maybe try again.
>
> The RFC is actually clean and implements PSR-0, it has been discussed
> and approved by many PHP frameworks or projects. We are hiding
> ourselves in the sand if we don't see that. Arguing about PSR-0 is
> fine but that's not the place to do it. And as PSR-0 is already
> approved, poeple with issues should bring them in the PSR-0 discussion
> channel, for the next version of PSR.

You're mixing stuff here.
"RFC on PSR-0 support into PHP status" != "PSR-0 status"

There is indeed no point discussing PSR-0 here, this is a standard (de
facto or not, I don't care).

However, *how* PSR-0 might be introduced into PHP, for those who uses
it, is for sure not ready yet and certainly not approved!

I'm all for having a PSR-0 loader in the core of PHP, but if I voted
"No", that is because I think the RFC is not ready yet.

> But blocking the only thing so many PHP projects have ever agreed on
> is a major mistake. And it is a political and religious choice
> (religious as in "php does not enforce standard"). Even for something
> that does not enforce anything if not used.

Some are blocking because they kinda feel forced if this is introduced.
Ignore those, PHP wouldn't have bundled ext/mysql for the same reasons
about 15 years ago.

I guess that some voted "No" because of lack of consensus.
There is a real need to clarify some of the valid concerns that have
been addressed regarding the API proposed.

> And as far as I can see, the RFC is approved as of now.

That is simply not true.

Patrick

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to