On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 10:27 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> So I'm not sure what you would expect from distros, but please share
> and we'll setup automated tests, call for our users to test, whatever
> it takes to avoid this type of situation. 

This issue is not about packagers specifically. What we need is that
more application and library developers test it. I think it is a shame
that PEAR, a php.net project like PHP itself, breaks. This must not
happen.

I have no idea what to do though. We have a list of "primary testers"
where I usually get one or two responses but most goes into the void.
When talking to application maintainers they don't have the time or
similar reasons and hope/trust that others will test enough. Maybe a
good thing in all this is that it is wakening ...

What else can we do? - More application tests? That's a nice idea but
not knowing the applications it is relatively time consuming to analyze
test failures in there (not to mention that many projects have a bad
test coverage ..) that happen easily due to "unimportant" changes.

johannes



-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to