On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> wrote: > On 07/13/2011 11:50 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> Are you saying that widely approved thing are pointless or we could >> have foreseen the results for each of them? Better to have a vote and >> got a massive support than nothing and sit in the middle of nowhere >> forever. > > I'm saying that many of these in the past were handled by a, "Hey guys, > any objections to adding E_STRICT to E_ALL in 5.4?" email which would > get a couple of, "go for it" replies and no objections, followed by the > change being committed. To me the voting is only needed when we have > trouble reaching a quick consensus and not for every little thing.
Yes, got it, they were rhetorical questions :). However doing it this way spares us time in the long run. While one or another proposal could get large and immediate adoption, it makes the whole thing clearer for the developers not following internals@ daily or to our users. -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
