hi Hannes, On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 20:02, David Soria Parra <d...@php.net> wrote: >> On 2011-07-12, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> hi, >>> >>> As of now I do not think we should allow this change, whether the RFC >>> is accepted or not does not matter as it will badly break BC. Unless >>> there is a patch allowing this change without affecting existing code >>> (main point being namespaced code working smoothly), this RFC should >>> be rejected. >>> >>> Cheers, >> >> >> I think this change has too much of an impact on backward compatibility. >> As long as we don't have a concrete implementation, I think we should >> let string, int not be reserved words. Argumentes were already presented. >> >> ps.: Pierre you might want to consider changing your vote in the wiki > > > This thread is an excellent example why attempting to reach consensus > by discussing things is important. > Voting should be considered as an desperate last resort, not the > primary mechanism. > > http://producingoss.com/en/consensus-democracy.html has several very > related points.
I disagree and this exact issue shows that the voting and controlling is actually working well, very well. As it is covered by the two recently adopted RFCs. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
