Am 09.06.2011 20:11, schrieb Michael Wallner: > In the past many developers did not feel comfy enough with the pecl_http > extension. It had been proposed for inclusion in the core distribution > for a few times, but people always had doubts about the API etc.
i do not understand why > Another major addition will be the choice of request handling library > http\Request > should use. libcurl, neon and serf are on the table currently. sounds like php-namespaces are introduced here even for people usig them NOT becuase of the braindead \ > Anyway, if people want to take part in architecting the future of this > extension, they are more than welcome. > > I already invited you to participate, but you did not answer what want you hear from me? let the api fuck in peace or you risk that the extension will not used in the future because you force all users to totally change their projects with the fear that 5 years later 3.0.0 breaks all baackward compatibility again
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
