Am 05.06.2011 13:58, schrieb Rasmus: > On 06/05/2011 08:50 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Also some exts are simply not used anymore or do not have active >>> developers >> >> but they compile with recent 3versions and if not >> the build will stop and someone fix it > > Sorry, but that doesn't actually happen. Only commonly used core things > are regularly tested.
why not? > We have plenty of core SAPIs, for example, that > haven't been compiled in years and likely don't work at all. sounds terrible until now i thought "it compiles it works" is the worst attitude but "i do not know if it compiles" is even worser > The same goes for pecl. Commonly used pecl extensions tend to work well so where can the user see if it is "commonly used"? > but the fringe stuff like gdchart, which I wrote, by the way, > gets very little attention so why there is no notice that it is no longer maintained so that possible users see this before it stops to work like gdchart did for php 5.3 > Release 0.2.0: PHP Version: PHP version 6.0.0 or older what a bull***t if it not works for 5.3 since a long time so make a fat deprecated warning or even remove it because it does not work and is a risk for every one who installs it bugfixing would be really glad, but if noone cares remove died code and do not suggest "will work even with php6"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
