On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Stefan Marr <p...@stefan-marr.de> wrote:
> Hi: > > On 09 May 2011, at 09:50, Stas Malyshev wrote: > > > I'm all for this idea, but the question is - can we have a good design & > implementation in next 2 months? If we can, great, if we can't - I'd rather > have 5.4 than wait for it. E.g., if we have somebody ready to commit for > certain timeframe to come up with it, then it makes sense to discuss it in > this context. > > Can't we just draw this arbitrary line in the sand, and say from now on, > controversial things are taken out and nothing new is added anymore? > > Everything which is not yet in trunk and is not required to round up the > release should go into the release after 5.4? > > For me it seems there is no progress because there is still to much > opportunity to improve things... > So, instead of allowing to nominate new features, it might be best to stick > to what we have now, and restrict ourselves to sort out the controversial > stuff. > > I think that it would be nice to have a short timeframe before feature freeze. Tyrael
