On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>wrote:
> Hi! > > > another thing that I would love to see on the list: named parameters. >> it was recently brought up, and I think that the original argument for >> the rejection isn't true anymore: >> http://www.php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#named-parameters >> adding naming parameters would actually help to make clean and >> maintainable code. >> > > I'm all for this idea, but the question is - can we have a good design & > implementation in next 2 months? If we can, great, if we can't - I'd rather > have 5.4 than wait for it. E.g., if we have somebody ready to commit for > certain timeframe to come up with it, then it makes sense to discuss it in > this context. > > agree. I think we could have a good one (if somebody actually start working on it), so I think we should leave the door open for this and if it's got written and approved before the code freeze then we will include it. Tyrael
