On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On 1/30/2011 10:36 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> On 1/30/11 8:30 PM, Daniel Convissor wrote: >>> >>> That's not an option for the large number of people who want to run PHP >>> under Apache, let alone folks who don't have VC9 tools. The diff() code >>> is mauling data types in undesirable, though easily fixable, ways. >> >> Aren't Apache VC9 builds readily available these days? > > From all I've heard, mod_fcgid is the way to go anyways, so isn't the > whole discussion academic? It doesn't matter how php is built if you > are loading the appropriate number of single process instances as fastcgi > daemons.
If the goal is to get something somehow stable, but horrible (performance and ability to use some windows APIs) from a design point of view for the windows platform, then yes, fcgi is the way to go and not necessary with apache then (IIS, nginx are way better choices in this case). But I strongly believe in a threaded base solution for windows. That's the only way to get anywhere close to the performance we can see on other platforms (read: posix). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
